Penggunaan Traktor Roda Dua pada Lahan Padi Sawah di Jawa Barat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pengembangan komoditas padi sawah yang berorientasi agribisnis seharusnya didukung oleh alat dan mesin pertanian antara lain traktor moda dua. Kajian ini dilakukan untuk mengevaluasi tingkat penggunaan, keragaan dan kelayakan penggunaan traktor roda dua di lahan padi sawah di Jawa Barat. Kajian ini juga bertujuan untuk membuat pendekatan pengembangan traktor roda dua di Jawa Barat berdasarkan kenyataan di lapangan dan kebijakan pemerintah. Kajian ini dilaksanakan melalui metode Pemahaman Pedesaan Partisipatif dan survey terstruk-tur. Hasil pengkajian menunjukkan bahwa ketersediaan traktor relatif memadai dengan tingkat partisipasi rumah tangga pengguna di musim hujan dan kemarau masing-masing 96 % dan 97 %. Usaha jasa traktor layak diusahakan karena mem-berikan nilai Revenue-Cost Rasio 1,36 dan Pay Back Period 2,74 per tahun dan titik Impas 30,77 ha/tahun. Pada penelitian ini, beberapa masalah sosial, budaya dan teknis dalam pengembangan traktor roda dua pada padi sawah di Jawa Barat telah diinventarisasi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.058 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".