MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147373084 · doi:10.1109/icip.2007.4378967

Segmentation and Recognition of Continuous Gestures

2007· article· en· W2147373084 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings - International Conference on Image Processing · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHand Gesture Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGestureDynamic time warpingComputer scienceGesture recognitionComputer visionArtificial intelligenceSet (abstract data type)SegmentationMotion (physics)Speech recognitionSIGNAL (programming language)Dynamic programmingPattern recognition (psychology)Algorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel method is introduced to segment and recognize time-varying human gestures from continuous video streams. Motion is represented by a 3D spatio-temporal surface based upon the evolution of a contour over time. The warping paths between the input signal and a set of gesture models are obtained using continuous dynamic programming and the boundary of a gesture is located by analyzing all possible gesture candidates during a specific period of time. Correlation and mutual information are employed to select the best candidate when more than one gesture is recognized at the same time period. The system has been implemented and tested on continuous gesture sequences containing 8 different gestures performed by 4 subjects. The results demonstrate that the proposed method is very effective, achieving a recognition rate of 95.9%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.759
Threshold uncertainty score0.573

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it