La dimension linguistique des enjeux interculturels : de l’Éveil aux langues à l’éducation plurilingue
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nous traiterons dans cet article de la dimension linguistique des enjeux interculturels en questionnant la prise en compte de la diversité linguistique dans les milieux scolaires québécois. En particulier, nous présenterons les programmes d’Éveil aux langues développés en Europe (Candelier, 2003b; Perregaux et al., 2003) et implantés récemment en Colombie-Britannique et au Québec (Armand et Dagenais, 2005), qui visent à préparer les élèves à vivre dans des sociétés linguistiquement et culturellement diverses. Après avoir abordé les liens entre ces programmes, l’éducation interculturelle et l’éducation à la citoyenneté, nous préciserons les principes importants à respecter, pour éviter des biais, lors de leur implantation. Enfin, nous appuyant sur les travaux récents du Conseil de l’Europe (Cadre européen commun de référence pour les langues, 2001; Guide pour l’élaboration des politiques linguistiques éducatives en Europe, 2007a), nous aborderons plus largement la question, au Québec, d’une éducation plurilingue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".