SR-ARQ for MIMO OFDM Systems with Channel State Information Only at the Receiver
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we compare two selective-repeat automatic-repeat-request (SR-ARQ) protocols for spatial multiplexintiplexingg multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) orthogonal frequency-division multiplexed (OFDM) systems assuming perfect channel state information (CSI) only at the receiver. These two SR-ARQ protocols differ in the number of packets transmitted simultaneously. In one protocol, a single packet is transmitted on all subcarriers from all antennae at the same time. In the other protocol, multiple packets are simultaneously transmitted. For the latter protocol, we also consider schemes that differ in the way that the subcarriers transmitted from different antennae are grouped to support the transmission of multiple packets in parallel. We compare the throughput and the resequencing delay of these SR-ARQ protocols in a frequency selective fading channel. Simulation results suggest that in such a system, the single ARQ protocol is the best choice. If we have to transmit multiple packets in parallel, each packet should be transmitted over a subband of adjacent subcarriers emitted from all transmit antennae.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it