MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147412892 · doi:10.1093/beheco/arh117

Offspring sex ratios correlate with pair–male condition in a cooperatively breeding fairy–wren

2004· article· en· W2147412892 on OpenAlexaff
Melanie Rathburn, Robert Montgomerie

Bibliographic record

VenueBehavioral Ecology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOffspringBiologyBroodSex allocationDemographySex ratioZoologyPlumageEcologyGeneticsPopulationPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examined sex allocation patterns in island and mainland populations of cooperatively breeding white-winged fairy-wrens. The marked differences in social structure between island and mainland populations, in addition to dramatic plumage variation among males both within and between populations, provided a unique situation in which we could investigate different predictions from sex allocation theory in a single species. First, we test the repayment (local resource enhancement) hypothesis by asking whether females biased offspring sex ratios in relation to the assistance they derived from helpers. Second, we test the male quality (attractiveness) hypothesis, which suggests that females mated to attractive high-quality males should bias offspring sex ratios in favor of males. Finally, we test the idea that females in good condition should bias offspring sex ratios toward males because they are able to allocate more resources to offspring, whereas females in poor condition should have increased benefits from producing more female offspring (Trivers-Willard hypothesis). We used molecular sexing techniques to assess total offspring sex ratios of 86 breeding pairs over 2 years. Both offspring and first brood sex ratios were correlated with the pair-male's body condition such that females increased the proportion of males in their brood in relation to the body condition (mass corrected for body size) of their social partner. This relation was both significant and remarkably similar in both years of our study and in both island and mainland populations. Although confidence of paternity can be low in this and other fairy-wren species, we show how this finding might be consistent with the male quality (attractiveness) hypothesis with respect to male condition. There was no support for the repayment hypothesis; the presence of helpers had no effect on offspring sex ratios. There was weak support for both the male quality (attractiveness) hypothesis with respect to plumage color and the maternal condition hypothesis, but their influence on offspring sex ratios was negligible after controlling for the effects of pair-male condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBehavioral EcologySame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207