The relationship between meiotic recombination in human spermatocytes and aneuploidy in sperm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We have previously demonstrated that a decreased recombination frequency between human X and Y chromosomes is associated with the production of aneuploid 24,XY sperm. This study's aim was to determine the relationship between recombination frequency in human pachytene spermatocytes and aneuploidy frequencies in individual chromosomes in sperm from the same men. METHODS: Six previously fertile vasectomy reversal patients donated testicular tissue for meiotic analysis of pachytene spermatocytes using immunocytogenetic techniques for visualization of the synaptonemal complex and recombination sites (MLH1). Individual meiotic chromosomes were identified with centromere-specific multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and the number of MLH1 signals was recorded for individual chromosomes. An ejaculated sperm sample was obtained from each patient 2-26 months post-reversal for FISH analysis of sperm aneuploidy frequencies of chromosomes 1, 9, 13, 21, X and Y. RESULTS: There was no significant correlation between meiotic recombination frequency and sperm aneuploidy for any individual chromosome. Similarly, there was no correlation between aneuploid sperm and bivalents with no recombination. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides unique data on intra-individual human recombination and aneuploidy events. It also demonstrated for the first time that men do not have an increased frequency of sperm aneuploidy 5-9 years post-vasectomy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".