MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147448117 · doi:10.1109/igarss.2003.1294002

Raw data based two-aperture SAR ground moving target indication

2004· article· en· W2147448117 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced SAR Imaging Techniques
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoving target indicationSynthetic aperture radarPhase centerComputer scienceAzimuthComputer visionInterferometryArtificial intelligenceRemote sensingAntenna (radio)Inverse synthetic aperture radarRadar imagingGeologyPulse-Doppler radarOpticsTelecommunicationsPhysicsRadar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the capability of classical two-channel SAR ground moving target indication (GMTI) techniques, such as displaced phase center antenna (DPCA) or along-track interferometry (ATI) when implemented on azimuth-uncompressed SAR data, rather than the processed SAR image. By transforming the data into the Doppler frequency domain complete target detection and parameter estimation scheme is proposed. In contrast to the conventional image based algorithms, the proposed techniques are able to detect even fast movers. The GMTI feasibility is demonstrated with measured airborne data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.570
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced SAR Imaging TechniquesFrench-language works237,207