Rapid and reversible formation of spine head filopodia in response to muscarinic receptor activation in CA1 pyramidal cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A key feature at excitatory synapses is the remodelling of dendritic spines, which in conjunction with receptor trafficking modifies the efficacy of neurotransmission. Here we investigated whether activation of cholinergic receptors, which can modulate synaptic plasticity, also mediates changes in dendritic spine structure. Using confocal time-lapse microscopy in mouse slice cultures we found that brief activation of muscarinic receptors induced the emergence of fine filopodia from spine heads in all CA1 pyramidal cells examined. This response was widespread occurring in 48% of imaged spines, appeared within minutes, was reversible, and was blocked by atropine. Electron microscopic analyses showed that the spine head filopodia (SHFs) extend along the presynaptic bouton. In addition, the decay time of miniature EPSCs was longer after application of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor agonist methacholine (MCh). Both morphological and electrophysiological changes were reduced by preventing microtubule polymerization with nocodazole. This extension of SHFs during cholinergic receptor activation represents a novel structural form of subspine plasticity that may regulate synaptic properties by fine-tuning interactions between presynaptic boutons and dendritic spines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".