MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147456715 · doi:10.1109/lpt.2004.839788

Optical network control overlay using silicon VOA arrays

2005· article· en· W2147456715 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Photonics Technology Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSubcarrierWavelength-division multiplexingOptical attenuatorBandwidth (computing)Control channelChannel (broadcasting)Optical performance monitoringOptical amplifierSubcarrier multiplexingOptical powerPower controlElectronic engineeringOptical fiberMaterials scienceOpticsPower (physics)Computer networkTelecommunicationsEngineeringOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingOptoelectronicsPhysicsMulti-mode optical fiber

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A silicon-based variable optical attenuator (VOA) is used to overlay optical control data on an underlying high-speed optical data channel. We demonstrate experimentally the addition of a 10.7-MHz (5 Kb/s) control subcarrier with <1-dB penalty to a high-speed channel (500 Mb/s) and quantify the penalty versus control data rate. The modest modulation bandwidth of the VOA enables control subcarriers at frequencies sufficiently high to avoid gain saturation-induced crosstalk in erbium amplifiers, while using the same devices required for channel gain equalization or power control. At OC-192 data rates, we predict that control-channel data rates of 10 Kb/s can be tolerated with <0.5-dB penalty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.251
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it