MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Geochemical and Nd isotopic evidence for sedimentary-source changes in the Devonian miogeocline of the southern Canadian Cordillera

2000· article· en· W2147457267 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Ross Stevenson, Steve Whittaker, E W Mountjoy

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society of America Bulletin · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsGeologyDevonianSedimentary rockGeochemistryPaleontologyEarth science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sedimentological evidence indicates that clastic sediments of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin were derived predominantly from the north and east, an exception being the westerly sourced Sassenach Formation in the Upper Devonian. A comparison of geochemical and Sm-Nd isotopic data of the Sassenach Formation and the underlying Perdrix and Mount Hawk Formations, which have easterly sources, support a change in sedimentary provenance. The Frasnian Perdrix and Mount Hawk Formations have initial ϵ Nd values of −7 to −8.5. This range of values is higher than that of the underlying Precambrian basement and reflects a mixture of older and younger crustal detritus (Late Proterozoic to Devonian) eroded and transported from orogens in the Arctic. The overlying Famennian Sassenach Formation yields lower initial ϵ Nd values that decrease from as high as −8.5 at the base to about −11 near the top. The lower ϵ Nd values of the Sassenach Formation imply that the western crustal source of the Sassenach sediments was, on average, older than the eastern crustal sources of the underlying formations. This older western source appears to be related to uplift and reworking of older miogeosynclinal sediments in the west as a result of compression related to the Antler orogeny.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.388
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society of America BulletinSame topicGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisFrench-language works237,207