MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147474855 · doi:10.7202/006512ar

Les femmes et la migration : les représentations identitaires et les stratégies devant les obstacles à l’insertion socioprofessionnelle à Québec

2003· article· fr· W2147474855 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Hélène Cardu, Mélanie Sanschagrin

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches féministes · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Comment les femmes immigrantes s’approprient-elles, sur le plan identitaire, leur environnement socioculturel et professionnel, lorsqu’elles sont en situation d’insertion et qu’elles vivent dans des régions où l’immigration est marginale? Pour elles, la trajectoire d’insertion professionnelle est non seulement déterminée par les bouleversements majeurs qui transforment à ce jour la structure de l’emploi mais aussi, par la profonde transition culturelle qui accompagne l’immigration. Étant donné que l’insertion socioprofessionnelle s’inscrit dans une trajectoire de vie où domine une transition impliquant la confrontation des aspirations professionnelles, personnelles et sociales, nous présentons les représentations identitaires liées au processus d’intégration à un nouveau milieu social et les stratégies face aux obstacles rencontrés, particulièrement comme femmes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0180.009
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.193
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches féministesSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207