MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147483891 · doi:10.1109/newcas.2006.250903

SoC memory optimization using loop transformations

2006· article· en· W2147483891 on OpenAlexaff
Youcef Bouchebaba, Valérie Gagné, Gabriela Nicolescu, M. Aboulhamid

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceLoop fusionLoop tilingCacheParallel computingMemory hierarchyLoop optimizationWrite bufferCompilerLoop fissionLoop (graph theory)Reduction (mathematics)CPU cacheSet (abstract data type)Factor (programming language)Compile timeCache algorithmsOptimizing compilerOperating systemProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In today's embedded systems, the memory hierarchy is rapidly becoming a major factor in terms of power, performance and area. This is especially true for embedded multimedia applications using temporary multi-dimensional arrays that are typically used to store intermediate results during multimedia processing. In this paper, we introduce a new buffer allocation method to replace these temporary arrays and we combine it with loop fusion and tiling. The simple and effective method we present simultaneously applies tiling with fusion to a set of loop nests. Then, it replaces temporary arrays with smaller buffers containing the useful data. These new techniques allow to optimize memory space and reduce the number of cache misses. Our buffer allocation method is implemented in the PIPS compiler and the experiments are made on the StepNP simulator. They show that our technique yields a significant reduction in the number of data cache misses (on average, the data cache miss ratio is decreased by 14.3%)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207