Expression of a stress‐induced hemoglobin affects NO levels produced by alfalfa root cultures under hypoxic stress
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transgenic alfalfa root cultures expressing sense and antisense barley hemoglobin transcripts were examined under varying levels of atmospheric oxygen. Root cultures overexpressing the hemoglobin gene (Hb+) maintained root growth when placed under 3% oxygen, whereas control cultures or cultures underexpressing hemoglobin (Hb-) experienced 30-70% declines in growth under the same conditions. ATP levels and ATP/ADP ratios for Hb+ lines did not significantly differ in 40 and 3% oxygen, whereas the ATP levels and ATP/ADP ratios in control and Hb- lines were significantly lower under 3% oxygen. Large increases in the production of nitric oxide (NO) were measured in root cultures grown under hypoxic conditions compared to aerobic conditions. The amount of NO accumulated in an Hb- line was 2.5-fold higher than that in the Hb+ line. Treatment of transgenic root lines under 40% oxygen with NO resulted in significant declines in the ATP levels and ATP/ADP ratio of an Hb- line and the control line, with no significant change in an Hb+ line. The root cell structure of an Hb- line showed evidence of cell breakdown under hypoxic growth, whereas an Hb+ line had no evidence of cell breakdown under similar growth conditions. These results lead us to hypothesize that NO is involved in the response of plants to hypoxia and that hemoglobin modulates the levels of NO in the hypoxic cell.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".