MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Role of Conserved Amino Acids in the Catalytic Activity of <i>Escherichia coli</i> Primase

2006· article· en· W2147528429 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Anna Rodina, G. Nigel Godson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bacteriology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Institutes of HealthYork University
KeywordsPrimaseBiologyAmino acidBiochemistryEscherichia coliMutagenesisNucleotideMutantPrimer (cosmetics)RNAChemistryGeneReverse transcriptase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The role of conserved amino acid residues in the polymerase domain of Escherichia coli primase has been studied by mutagenesis. We demonstrate that each of the conserved amino acids Arg146, Arg221, Tyr230, Gly266, and Asp311 is involved in the process of catalysis. Residues Glu265 and Asp309 are also critical because a substitution of each amino acid irreversibly destroys the catalytic activity. Two K229A and M268A mutant primase proteins synthesize only 2-nucleotide products in de novo synthesis reactions under standard conditions. Y267A mutant primase protein synthesizes both full-size and 2-nucleotide RNA, but with no intermediate-size products. From these data we discuss the significant step of the 2-nucleotide primer RNA synthesis by E. coli primase and the role of amino acids Lys229, Tyr267, and Met268 in primase complex stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of BacteriologySame topicRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsFrench-language works237,207