3D Reconstruction of Environments for Tele-Operation of Planetary Rover
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper we consider the problem of constructing a 3D environment model for the tele-operation of a planetary rover. We presented our approach to 3D environment reconstruction from large sparse range data sets. In space robotics applications, an accurate and up-to-date model of the environment is very important for a variety of reasons. In particular, the model can be used for safe tele-operation, path planning and mapping points of interest. We propose an on-line reconstruction of the environment using data provided by an on-board high resolution and accurate 3D range sensor (LIDAR). Our approach is based on on-line acquisition of range scans from different view-points with overlapping regions, merge them together into a single point cloud, and then fit an irregular triangular mesh on the merged data. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in localization, path planning and execution scenario on the Mars Yard located at the Canadian Space Agency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it