The Empirical Effects of Islam on Economic Development in Malaysia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The studies on the effects of religion on economic development and growth had intrigued the economists to further develop quantitative plausible hypotheses for empirical testing. In Malaysia, albeit implementation of Islamic based policy in economic development had been started since 1969 with the inception of the Pilgrimage Management and Fund Board (Tabung Haji), and recently with the development of Islamic banking and takaful sector; there was very little evidence on the effectiveness of such policy that had been reported by the researchers over the last 40 years. This study was to fill the gap and to review the previous research findings on relationship between Islam and economic development. The objective was to investigate the empirical effects of Islam on economic development in Malaysia. The subject of Islam and economic development had raised a hypothesis whether there was a level relationship in short and long-run equilibria. The Islamization index was employed as a proxy of Islam. Real per capita GDP is used as the indicator of economic development. An autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach was utilized for empirical analyses based on 42-year dataset from 1969 to 2011. Basically, the results from the cointegration analyses using ARDL approach suggested that Islam, as a religion of the population, had a significant effect on economic development in Malaysia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it