MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147539260 · doi:10.1109/cscwd.2009.4968119

Methodology towards the implementation of performance management for virtual enterprise

2009· article· en· W2147539260 on OpenAlexaff
Wenan Tan, Xianhua Zhao, Weiming Shen, Chuanqun Jiang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCollaboration in agile enterprises
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCustomer satisfactionAgile software developmentKnowledge managementProcess managementComputer scienceAgile manufacturingProduct (mathematics)Production (economics)BusinessMarketingSoftware engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Virtual enterprise (VE) is the prime organization pattern of manufacturing in the 21st century, which generally is regarded as a management method for entity enterprise (EE), namely traditional enterprise, to realize agile manufacture using exterior resources. VE's performance management may be considered as the extension of the entity enterprise performance management. Based on the balanced score card, a VE's performance measurement system has been implemented by taking the degrees of satisfaction with member selection in learning and growth perspective, process collaboration between members in internal business perspective, the product-delivered time to customer in customer perspective, and the production cost in financial perspective, as the top layer performance indictors of the VE's performance management system,. The evaluation methods for the member selection, the process collaboration satisfaction degree, the product-delivered time satisfaction degree, and the production cost satisfaction degree for VE are discussed to validate the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.740
Threshold uncertainty score0.699

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCollaboration in agile enterprisesFrench-language works237,207