MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147541178 · doi:10.1080/01418610108214428

Climb/glide dislocation sources at low-misfit Ge<sub><i>x</i></sub>Si<sub><i>1</i>-<i>x</i></sub>-Si(001) interfaces

2001· article· en· W2147541178 on OpenAlexaff
S. Jiao, P. B. Hirsch, Doug D. Perovic

Bibliographic record

VenuePhilosophical magazine. A/Philosophical magazine. A. Physics of condensed matter. Structure, defects and mechanical properties · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon and Solar Cell Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimbDislocationMaterials scienceVacancy defectNucleationCondensed matter physicsCrystallographyBurgers vectorHeterojunctionPlanarChemistryComposite materialPhysicsOptoelectronicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Detailed analysis of Burgers vectors and line directions has been carried out on three types of dislocation defect (called X, Y and single loops) formed in lowmisfit Ge x Si 1-x /Si(001) heterostructures, grown under conditions of planar interface growth. The X and Y defects originate from small prismatic vacancy half-loops nucleated at visible precipitates at the strained-layer-Si substrate interface. The single-loop defects also originate from small vacancy character half-loops usually nucleated at the interface but also sometimes within the strained layer. After growth, none of the dislocations lies in glide planes, and all three dislocation structures have to be transformed into glissile configurations before they can generate strain-relieving dislocations. The mechanism controlling this sessile/glissile transformation is climb by vacancy absorption. This corresponds to the nucleation stage for the generation of misfit dislocations observed by Houghton and is consistent with the experimental results of Stirpe et al. who found a reduction in the nucleation rates during rapid thermal anneals after Si irradiation at room temperature of the as-grown samples. The paper discusses the driving forces controlling the formation of the observed structures, and their sessile-glissile transformation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhilosophical magazine. A/Philosophical magazine. A. Physics of condensed matter. Structure, defects and mechanical propertiesSame topicSilicon and Solar Cell TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207