Incorporating complex cells into neural networks for pattern classification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Computational neuroscientists have hypothesized that the visual system from the retina to at least primary visual cortex is continuously fitting a latent variable probability model to its stream of perceptions. It is not known exactly which probability model, nor exactly how the fitting takes place, but known algorithms for fitting such models require conditional estimates of the latent variables. This gives us a strong hint as to why the visual system might be fitting such a model; in the right kind of model those conditional estimates can also serve as excellent features for analyzing the semantic content of images perceived. The work presented here uses image classification performance (accurate discrimination between common classes of objects) as a basis for comparing visual system models, and algorithms for fitting those models as probability densities to images. This dissertation (a) finds that models based on visual area V1's complex cells generalize better from labeled training examples than conventional neural networks whose hidden units are more like V1's simple cells, (b) presents novel interpretations for complex-cell-based visual system models as probability distributions and novel algorithms for fitting them to data, and (c) demonstrates that these models form better features for image classification after they are first trained as probability models. Visual system models based on complex cells achieve some of the best results to date on the CIFAR-10 image classification benchmark, and samples from their probability distributions indicate that they have learnt to capture important aspects of natural images. Two auxiliary technical innovations that made this work possible are also described: a random search algorithm for selecting hyper-parameters, and an optimizing compiler for matrix-valued mathematical expressions which can target both CPU and GPU devices. Keywords: machine learning, visual area V1, hyper-parameter selection, computer vision, biological vision.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".