MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147547292 · doi:10.1109/ias.1997.629037

Distribution system voltage regulation under fault conditions using static series regulators

2002· article· en· W2147547292 on OpenAlex
Kamal Al Haddad, G. Joós

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformerVoltage regulationVoltageCompensation (psychology)Control theory (sociology)Computer scienceVoltage sagThree-phasePower conditionerEngineeringFault (geology)AC powerElectronic engineeringPower qualityTopology (electrical circuits)Electrical engineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Power quality and availability are becoming important issues for critical and sensitive loads. Many of the disturbances are caused by faults on the utility distribution system in one or more phases, resulting in voltage dips and sags. This paper presents a viable alternative to UPS solutions to three phase load support in the form of practical series compensator structures. The compensators consist of transformer coupled voltage source inverters fed from a single diode rectifier connected to the faulted AC supply. The balancing and regulating algorithms are developed and applied to partial and total single phase to three phase type of faults. The compensation capability of the proposed schemes are derived. Practical issues, such as design, converter rating and the relative merits of each topology are considered. The paper also provides experimental results for a 2 kVA prototype power conditioner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.520
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Quality and HarmonicsFrench-language works237,207