MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147550790 · doi:10.2514/6.2005-5230

A Three-Dimensional Multi-Block Newton-Krylov Flow Solver for the Euler Equations

2005· article· en· W2147550790 on OpenAlexaff
Jason J. Nichols, David W. Zingg

Bibliographic record

Venue17th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersOffice National d'études et de Recherches Aérospatiales
KeywordsSolverComputer scienceBlock (permutation group theory)Backward Euler methodEuler's formulaApplied mathematicsEuler equationsFlow (mathematics)Newton's methodEuler methodMathematicsMathematical optimizationMathematical analysisPhysicsGeometryNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A three-dimensional multi-block Newton-Krylov flow solver for the Euler equations has been developed for steady aerodynamic flows. The solution is computed through a Jacobian-free inexact-Newton method with an approximate-Newton method for startup. The linear system at each outer iteration is solved using a Generalized Minimal Residual (GMRES) Krylov subspace algorithm. An incomplete lower/upper (ILU) factored preconditioner with reverse Cuthill-Mckee reordering is utilized to increase the efficiency of GMRES. The parameters in the solver are optimized to provide a balance between speed and robustness. Tests are performed using a variety of flow conditions and grid sizes. Results are compared to experimental values and other established numerical solvers. The solver demonstrates fast convergence and accurate solutions on grids up to one million nodes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue17th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics ConferenceSame topicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational MathematicsFrench-language works237,207