MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147590195 · doi:10.1109/waina.2009.183

The Rational for Developing Larger-scale 1000+ Machine Emulation-Based Research Test Beds

2009· article· en· W2147590195 on OpenAlexaffabout
Stephen W. Neville, Kin Fun Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicSimulation Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmulationPlanetLabCloud computingComputer scienceContext (archaeology)Scale (ratio)Test (biology)Agency (philosophy)Work (physics)Software engineeringData scienceEngineeringWorld Wide WebOperating systemThe Internet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This position paper outlines the need and rational for developing large-scale emulation facilities structured to allow the scientific method tenets to be met on a per experiment basis. The work specifically focuses on the need to develop emulation-based test beds on the 1000+ machine scale, as expressed within the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Program Agency's (DARPA) BAA-08-43 Broad Agency Announcement of May 2008 for a National Cyber Range, the University of Victoria's Fall 2008 application to the Canadian Foundation for Innovation for a Canadian at-scale Emulation Laboratory (CASElab), and the recent HP-Intel-Yahoo global cloud computing test bed initiative. The work places these proposed large-scale facilities both within the general context of the standard research tools (i.e., analytical analysis, simulation studies, ad hoc testing, and smaller-scale emulation), as their placement against other available test beds, most notably Emulab, DETERlab, and PlanetLab.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.352
GPT teacher head0.535
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSimulation Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207