Carrier-mediated urea transport across the mitochondrial membrane of an elasmobranch (<i>Raja erinacea</i>) and a teleost (<i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i>) fish
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In osmoregulating teleost fish, urea is a minor nitrogen excretory product, whereas in osmoconforming marine elasmobranchs it serves as the major tissue organic solute and is retained at relatively high concentrations ( approximately 400 mmol/l). We tested the hypothesis that urea transport across liver mitochondria is carrier mediated in both teleost and elasmobranch fishes. Intact liver mitochondria in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) demonstrated two components of urea uptake, a linear component at high concentrations and a phloretin-sensitive saturable component [Michaelis constant (K(m)) = 0.58 mmol/l; maximal velocity (V(max)) = 0.12 mumol.h(-1).mg protein(-1)] at lower urea concentrations (<5 mmol/l). Similarly, analysis of urea uptake in mitochondria from the little skate (Raja erinacea) revealed a phloretin-sensitive saturable transport (K(m) = 0.34 mmol/l; V(max) = 0.054 mumol.h(-1).mg protein(-1)) at low urea concentrations (<5 mmol/l). Surprisingly, urea transport in skate, but not trout, was sensitive to a variety of classic ionophores and respiration inhibitors, suggesting cation sensitivity. Hence, urea transport was measured in the reverse direction using submitochondrial particles in skate. Transport kinetics, inhibitor response, and pH sensitivity were very similar in skate submitochondrial particle submitochondrial particles (K(m) = 0.65 mmol/l, V(max) = 0.058 mumol.h(-1).mg protein(-1)) relative to intact mitochondria. We conclude that urea influx and efflux in skate mitochondria is dependent, in part, on a bidirectional proton-sensitive mechanism similar to bacterial urea transporters and reminiscent of their ancestral origins. Rapid equilibration of urea across the mitochondrial membrane may be vital for cell osmoregulation (elasmobranch) or nitrogen waste excretion (teleost).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".