MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147661439 · doi:10.1097/jsm.0b013e3181fc94e6

Is the Risk of Injury Greater in Pee Wee Hockey Leagues that Permit Body Checking?

2010· letter· en· W2147661439 on OpenAlexaffabout
William O. Roberts

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Journal of Sport Medicine · 2010
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Canadian institutionsMax Bell FoundationCanadian Institutes of Health Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChristian ministryLeagueMedicineLibrary scienceGerontologyFamily medicinePolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

University of Minnesota Medical School, St Paul, Minnesota, USA. Source of funding for the original study: Canadian Institutes of Health Research; the Max Bell Foundation; national, provincial, and municipal hockey associations; and the Quebec Ministry of Education, Leisure and Sport. Correspondence about the original study: Carolyn A. Emery, PhD, BScPT, Sport Medicine Centre, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada (e-mail: [email protected])

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0080.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Journal of Sport MedicineSame topicCardiovascular Effects of ExerciseFrench-language works237,207