Numerical Study of Two-Dimensional Circular Cylinders in Tandem at Moderate Reynolds Numbers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Computer simulations of the flow around a pair of two-dimensional, tandem circular cylinders in a flow, for Reynolds numbers in the range 1–40, are described. Cylinder surface-to-surface separations in the range 0.1<s/D<400 (D = cylinder diameter) were considered. The computed wake of a single cylinder at these low to moderate Reynolds numbers was in surprisingly good agreement with the laminar wake approximation, and a simple theory is presented to explain this agreement. With tandem cylinders, the drag on the downstream cylinder is a monotonic function of the cylinder separation. The laminar wake approximation can be used to explain reasonably well the variation in drag. The drag on the upstream cylinder is also a monotonic function of separation distance provided that the Reynolds number is less than about 10. For Reynolds numbers between 10 and 40, the upstream cylinder drag first decreases as separation increases up to a few diameters and then increases monotonically with separation distance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it