MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147737023 · doi:10.1039/c4an02189d

Direct detection of microRNA based on plasmon hybridization of nanoparticle dimers

2014· article· en· W2147737023 on OpenAlexafffund
Yang Wang, Elspeth MacLachlan, Bach Kim Nguyen, Guodong Fu, Chun Peng, Jennifer I. L. Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Analyst · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityToronto Public Health
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchYork UniversityUniversities Space Research Association
KeywordsmicroRNANanoparticlePlasmonRNAChemistryBiomarkerNanotechnologyBiophysicsMaterials scienceBiologyBiochemistryGeneOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MicroRNAs (miRNA) are important for regulating a range of biochemical pathways. Abnormal levels of miRNA in cells or secreted into biological fluids have been identified in diseases. MiRNA can therefore be potential biomarkers for early disease diagnosis; however their detection and quantification are challenging. Herein we apply the sensing platform of discrete actuatable dimers for the detection of human miR-210 (hsa-miR-210-3p). The detection signal is a spectral blue shift in the hybridized plasmon mode as monitored by single-nanostructure spectroscopy. We investigate the specificity and detection limit of the platform and quantify miR-210 levels in RNA extracts of cells cultured under different oxygen tensions. In addition we demonstrate the feasibility of detection in complex media by examining miR-210 secreted in cell media. This sensing platform may be developed as a bioanalytical tool for validating miRNA profiles of biological fluids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.182

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe AnalystSame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207