MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147752571 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2014.2305661

Broadband Compact Silicon Wire to Silicon Slot Waveguide Orthogonal Bend

2014· article· en· W2147752571 on OpenAlexaff
Herman M. K. Wong, Charles Lin, Mohamed A. Swillam, Amr S. Helmy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceSiliconSilicon on insulatorBandwidth (computing)WidebandOptoelectronicsBroadbandOpticsWaveguideCoupling lossPhysicsOptical fiberEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An ultra-compact 90° bend between silicon (Si) wire and silicon slot waveguide (SSW) with a footprint of ~725 nm × 500 nm is experimentally demonstrated on silicon-on-insulator substrate. By achieving momentum matching of the waveguides through an orthogonal junction placement, and maximizing modal overlap through an angled facet, coupling efficiency of ~70% and 3-dB bandwidth of over 500 nm has been achieved. The nominal experimental transmission through cascaded input (Si wire to SSW) and output (SSW to Si wire) orthogonal junctions match closely those obtained from simulations, both in the range from 1270 to 1360 nm and from 1480 to 1590 nm. For slot widths ranging from 30 to 230 nm, our Si wire-SSW bend can achieve coupling efficiency comparable to that of a direct butt-coupler over a 400 nm bandwidth. This compact and wideband waveguide bend serves as an important component to enable dense integration between conventional Si wire and SSW.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.379
Threshold uncertainty score0.735

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lightwave TechnologySame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207