MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147765269 · doi:10.1586/erd.09.26

Light-emitting diode technologies for TB diagnosis: what is on the market?

2009· review· en· W2147765269 on OpenAlex
Jessica Minion, Hojoon Sohn, Madhukar Pai

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Medical Devices · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiosensors and Analytical Detection
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill UniversityMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSputumTuberculosisIntensive care medicineTuberculinPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

. Despite this enormous global burden, case detec-tion rates are low, posing an enormous hurdle for TB control. Conventional TB diagnosis approaches continue to rely on century-old tests, such as sputum smear microscopy, solid media culture, tuberculin skin tests and chest radiogra-phy. These tests have several limitations and perform quite poorly in popula-tions affected by the HIV epidemic

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.838
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it