Calcium‐ and magnesium‐dependent interactions between calcium‐ and integrin‐binding protein and the integrin αIIb cytoplasmic domain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Calcium- and integrin-binding protein (CIB) is a small EF-hand calcium-binding protein that is involved in hemostasis through its interaction with the alphaIIb cytoplasmic domain of integrinalphaIIbbeta(3). We have previously demonstrated that CIB lacks structural stability in the absence of divalent metal ions but that it acquires a well-folded conformation upon addition of Ca(2+) or Mg(2+). Here, we have used fluorescence spectroscopy, NMR spectroscopy, and isothermal titration calorimetry to demonstrate that both Ca(2+)-bound CIB (Ca(2+)-CIB) and the Mg(2+)-bound protein (Mg(2+)-CIB) bind with high affinity and through a similar mechanism to alphaIIb cytoplasmic domain peptides, but that metal-free CIB (apo-CIB) binds in a different manner. The interactions are thermodynamically distinct for Ca(2+)-CIB and Mg(2+)-CIB, but involve hydrophobic interactions in each case. Since the Mg(2+) concentration inside the cell is sufficient to saturate CIB at all times, our results imply that CIB would be capable of binding to the alphaIIb cytoplasmic domain independent of an intracellular Ca(2+) stimulus in vivo. This raises the question of whether CIB can act as a Ca(2+) sensor in alphaIIbbeta(3) signaling or if other regulatory mechanisms such as fibrinogen-induced conformational changes in alphaIIbbeta(3), post-translational modifications, or the binding of other accessory proteins mediate the interactions between CIB and alphaIIbbeta(3). Differences in NMR spectra do suggest, however, that Ca(2+)-binding to the Mg(2+)- CIB-alphaIIb complex induces subtle structural changes that could further modulate the activity of alphaIIbbeta(3).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".