MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147922111 · doi:10.1086/368019

Interstellar Deuterium, Nitrogen, and Oxygen Abundances toward GD 246, WD 2331−475, HZ 21, and Lanning 23: Results from the<i>FUSE</i>Mission

2003· article· en· W2147922111 on OpenAlexaff
Cristina Oliveira, G. Hébrard, J. Christopher Howk, J. W. Kruk, P. Chayer, H. W. Moos

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsLine-of-sightLocal BubbleAstrophysicsSpectral lineLine (geometry)Interstellar mediumAstronomyGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The interstellar abundances of D I, N I, and O I in the local ISM are studied using high-resolution spectra of four hot white dwarfs. The spectra of GD 246, WD 2331-475, HZ 21, and Lan 23 were obtained with the Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer ( FUSE ) in the wavelength range 905-1187 Å. The line of sight to GD 246 probes the Local Interstellar Cloud and at least one other H I cloud inside the Local Bubble, which contains most of the gas seen along this line of sight. The column densities of H I, C II*, S II, and Si II are measured using archival Hubble Space Telescope STIS echelle-mode observations. The H I column density is determined by fitting the strong damping wings of interstellar Lyα and using a model atmosphere to account for the stellar continuum. The sight line-averaged ratios for GD 246 are D I/H I = 1.51 × 10 -5 , O I/H I = 3.63 × 10 -4 , and D I/O I = 4.17 × 10 -2 (uncertainties are 2 σ). This line of sight provides the fourth reliable FUSE measurement of the Local Bubble D/H ratio. For the WD 2331-475 line of sight, we find sight line-averaged ratios D I/O I = 5.13 × 10 -2 and D I/N I = 4.57 × 10 -1 . Toward HZ 21 the sight line-averaged ratios are D I/O I = 4.57 × 10 -2 and D I/N I = 4.27 × 10 -1 . In the higher column density sight line to Lan 23, the sight line-averaged ratios are D I/O I = 3.24 × 10 -2 and D I/N I = 3.16 × 10 -1 . Molecular hydrogen, corresponding to rotational levels J ≤ 3, is clearly seen along this line of sight. No reliable H I measurements are available for WD 2331-475, HZ 21, or Lan 23. We combine the different abundance ratios computed here with previous published values to produce revised FUSE abundance ratios for D I/H I, O I/H I, N I/H I, D I/N I, D I/O I, and O I/N I.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations102
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207