MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147940890 · doi:10.7202/016312ar

Mélange des discours et « confusion des accents 1 »

2007· article· fr· W2147940890 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Lucie Joubert

Bibliographic record

VenueVoix et Images · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Si fort, si présent dans les années 1970 au Québec, le discours féministe trouve-t-il des échos dans les textes littéraires contemporains, tant masculins que féminins ? Marque-t-il les oeuvres des plus jeunes auteurs — trop jeunes à l’époque — pour qui il subsiste seulement à l’état de référence historique ? Les idéaux féministes auraient-ils réussi à influencer les textes littéraires actuels au point d’être parties prenantes du discours romanesque ou servent-ils encore seulement de repoussoir ? À partir de certaines oeuvres ciblées dont Le chemin des dames (1977) de Madeleine Ferron, Scrapbook (2004) de Nadine Bismuth et Chercher le vent (2002) de Guillaume Vigneault, on verra que c’est sous le mode ludique, essentiellement, que se détecte l’influence du féminisme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.552
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVoix et ImagesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207