MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147945285 · doi:10.1109/icdcs.2014.22

Cooperative and Efficient Real-Time Scheduling for Automotive Communications

2014· article· en· W2147945285 on OpenAlexaff
Yu Hua, Lei Rao, Xue Liu, Dan Feng

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicReal-Time Systems Scheduling
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlexRayRetransmissionComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)Computer networkScheduleTransmission (telecommunications)Automotive industryReal-time computingReliability (semiconductor)Transmission delayEmbedded systemDistributed computingNetwork packetEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

FlexRay is an automotive network communication protocol. It provides support to transmit time-sensitive messages in automobiles. FlexRay transmits periodic messages in a static segment and a periodic messages in a dynamic segment. To improve transmission reliability, FlexRay offers hybrid data management schemes for both static and dynamic segments. However, existing approaches only schedule static segment and dynamic segment separately, leading to poor bandwidth utilization and transmission delay. Moreover, due to the bandwidth limitation, existing best-effort retransmission for all segments fails to achieve high reliability. To address these two concerns, we propose a novel and efficient scheduling scheme, called Coefficient. The idea behind Coefficient is to cooperatively schedule the static and dynamic segments, while judiciously stealing the selective slacks for reliable transmission based on practical fault models. Coefficient schedules both static and dynamic segments in the dual-channel manner based on practical fault models. Extensive experiments based on real-world case studies demonstrate that Coefficient meets the needs of both real-time transmission and reliability requirements, and delivers significant performance improvements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReal-Time Systems SchedulingFrench-language works237,207