Acute and chronic leptin treatment mediate contrasting effects on signaling, glucose uptake, and GLUT4 translocation in L6‐GLUT4myc myotubes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have previously shown that in L6-GLUT4myc rat skeletal muscle cells, acute treatment with leptin reduced insulin-stimulated glucose uptake without altering insulin-stimulated GLUT4 translocation. In contrast, we show here that the ability of leptin to increase phosphorylation of its receptor and to reduce insulin-stimulated glucose uptake was lost in cells that were continuously exposed to leptin for 24 h. This desensitization correlated with an increase in expression of suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 (SOCS-3). Time course analysis demonstrated that the transition from acute to chronic effects of leptin occurs after 2 h. The desensitization of leptin action at 24 h was not reversed by 30 min washout period prior to re-exposing cells to leptin. However, despite insulin-stimulated glucose uptake being unaffected upon 24 h preincubation with leptin, a small but significant decrease (37%) in insulin-stimulated GLUT4 translocation and phosphorylation of Akt on T308 was detected. Insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of Akt on S473 or of p38 MAPK were unaffected. These results suggest that the chronic leptin treatment leads to desensitization of leptin signaling yet can simultaneously decrease the ability of insulin to phosphorylate Akt on T308 and translocate GLUT4. However, this does not manifest as a reduction in total glucose uptake into L6 myotubes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".