MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147980695 · doi:10.1109/mwsym.2005.1516872

Restoration of passivity in s-parameter data of microwave measurements

2005· article· en· W2147980695 on OpenAlex
D. Saraswat, Ramachandra Achar, M. Nakhla

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, 2005. · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassivityInterfacingComputer scienceBandwidth (computing)MicrowaveEquivalent circuitElectronic engineeringExperimental dataRLC circuitAlgorithmElectrical engineeringEngineeringMathematicsTelecommunicationsComputer hardwareStatisticsCapacitor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

 Circuit modeling of networks described by tabulated S-parameters has generated immense interest during the recent years. The tabulated data may be obtained either from measurements or full-wave EM simulations. However, one of the major difficulties with such type of data is that, the data can be non-passive in the frequency bandwidth of interest, due to the measurement errors or the numerical errors associated with the full-wave simulator. This causes significant difficulty while interfacing such a data with circuit simulators. To overcome this difficulty, this paper presents an efficient algorithm for restoring the passivity of the S-parameter data, prior to its circuit modeling. Numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the validity and efficiency of the proposed algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it