MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148068092 · doi:10.1109/bsc.2010.5472946

Opportunistic routing for enhanced source-location privacy in wireless sensor networks

2010· article· en· W2148068092 on OpenAlexaff
Petros Spachos, Liang Song, Dimitrios Hatzinakos

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWireless sensor networkComputer scienceComputer networkGeographic routingKey distribution in wireless sensor networksNetwork packetMobile wireless sensor networkAdversarySoftware deploymentDynamic Source RoutingRouting (electronic design automation)WirelessRouting protocolDistributed computingWireless networkComputer securityTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wireless sensor networks are designed for a plethora of applications, such as unattended event monitoring and tracking. Source-privacy is one of the looming challenges that threaten successful deployment of these sensor networks, especially when they are used to monitor sensitive objects. In order to enhance source-location privacy in wireless sensor networks, we propose the use opportunistic routing schemes. In opportunistic routing, each sensor transmits the packet over a dynamic path to the destination. Every packet from the source can follow a different path toward the destination, making it difficult for an adversary to backtrack hop-by-hop to the origin of the sensor data. In the context of providing source location privacy for wireless sensor networks, the obtained simulation results demonstrate the efficiency and suitability of opportunistic routing in practical applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score0.624

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207