MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148071973 · doi:10.1139/v08-182

Structure and stability of aquotetrafluorouranyl(VI) in the solid state — Density functional study of [UO<sub>2</sub>F<sub>4</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)][NMe<sub>4</sub>]<sub>2</sub>·2H<sub>2</sub>O<sup>,</sup>

2009· article· en· W2148071973 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michæl Bühl

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadioactive element chemistry and processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryUranylAqueous solutionCrystallographyMolecular dynamicsDensity functional theoryMoleculeIonCounterionLigand (biochemistry)Crystal structureCoordination numberCrystal (programming language)Physical chemistryComputational chemistryInorganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Periodic density functional computations have been performed for solid [UO2F4(H2O)][NMe4]2·2H2O at the BLYP level. A model with disordered fluoro and aquo ligands in the uranyl anion is significantly lower in energy than one with a symmetrical assignment of these sites, which was favored in the original X-ray crystallography study. According to optimized energies and Car–Parrinello molecular dynamics (CPMD) simulations, the [UO2F4(H2O)]2− ion in the solid is stable with respect to loss of the coordinated water molecule. In contrast, CPMD simulations had found this ligand to be unbound in aqueous solution. The role of the counterions in stabilizing the higher coordination number in the crystal is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicRadioactive element chemistry and processingFrench-language works237,207