Azospirillum zeae sp. nov., a diazotrophic bacterium isolated from rhizosphere soil of Zea mays
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial strains, N6 and N7(T), were isolated from corn rhizosphere. A polyphasic taxonomic approach, including morphological characterization, Biolog analysis, DNA-DNA hybridization, and 16S rRNA, cpn60 and nifH gene sequence analysis, was taken to analyse the two strains. 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis indicated that strains N6 and N7(T) both belonged to the genus Azospirillum and were closely related to Azospirillum oryzae (98.7 and 98.8 % similarity, respectively) and Azospirillum lipoferum (97.5 and 97.6 % similarity, respectively). DNA-DNA hybridization of strains N6 and N7(T) showed reassociation values of 48 and 37 %, respectively, with A. oryzae and 43 % with A. lipoferum. Sequences of the nifH and cpn60 genes of both strains showed 99 and approximately 95 % similarity, respectively, with those of A. oryzae. Chemotaxonomic characteristics (Q-10 as quinone system, 18 : 1omega7c as major fatty acid) and G+C content of the DNA (67.6 mol%) were also similar to those of members of the genus Azospirillum. Gene sequences and Biolog and fatty acid analysis showed that strains N6 and N7(T) differed from the closely related species A. lipoferum and A. oryzae. On the basis of these results, it is proposed that these nitrogen-fixing strains represent a novel species. The name Azospirillum zeae sp. nov. is suggested, with N7(T) (=NCCB 100147(T)=LMG 23989(T)) as the type strain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".