Deeper understanding of non-linear geodetic data inversion using a quantitative sensitivity analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. A quantitative global sensitivity analysis (SA) is applied to the non-linear inversion of gravity changes and displacement data which measured in an active volcanic area. The common inversion of this data is based on the solution of the generalized Navier equations which couples both types of observation, gravity and displacement, in a homogeneous half space. The sensitivity analysis has been carried out using Sobol's variance-based approach which produces the total sensitivity indices (TSI), so that all interactions between the unknown input parameters are taken into account. Results of the SA show quite different sensitivities for the measured changes as they relate to the unknown parameters for the east, north and height component, as well as the pressure, radial and mass component of an elastic-gravitational source. The TSIs are implemented into the inversion in order to stabilize the computation of the unknown parameters, which showed wide dispersion ranges in earlier optimization approaches. Samples which were computed using a genetic algorithm (GA) optimization are compared to samples in which the results of the global sensitivity analysis are integrated by a reweighting of the cofactor matrix in the objective function. The comparison shows that the implementation of the TSI's can decrease the dispersion rate of unknown input parameters, producing a great improvement the reliable determination of the unknown parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it