MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

RED: the analysis, management and dissemination ofexpressed sequence tags

2002· article· en· W2148132327 on OpenAlexaff
Rebecca Everitt, Stephanie E. Minnema, Michael A. Wride, C S Koster, Jackie Hance, Fiona C. Mansergh, Derrick E. Rancourt

Bibliographic record

VenueBioinformatics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMolecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersMedical Research CouncilNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsSequence (biology)Sequence analysisWorld Wide WebWeb siteExpressed sequence tagDNA sequencingLibrary scienceComputer scienceDatabaseBiologyInformation retrievalThe InternetGeneticsDNAComplementary DNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Summary: The Rancourt EST Database (RED) is a web-based system for the analysis, management, and dissemination of expressed sequence tags (ESTs). RED represents a flexible template DNA sequence database that can be easily manipulated to suit the needs of other laboratories undertaking mid-size sequencing projects. Availability: http://www.ucalgary.ca/~rancourt Contact: reveritt@ucalgary.ca * To whom correspondence should be addressed. 1 Present address: Cardiff University, Biomedical Sciences Building, Museum Avenue, PO Box 911, Cardiff CF10 3US, Wales, UK.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.745
Threshold uncertainty score0.230

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioinformaticsSame topicMolecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207