Enhanced southward flow over the Oregon shelf in 2002: A conduit for subarctic water
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Moored current measurements from the Oregon shelf during 1998–2003 are used to estimate time series of anomalous alongshore currents and pseudo‐displacements, after accounting for the mean and seasonal cycle. From early January through mid‐June, 2002, currents at 10 m were anomalously strong toward the south by an average 12 cm/s, producing an anomalous displacement of more than 1500 km over about 5 months. This may be compared with the finding by Freeland et al. [2003] that waters at the same latitude off Oregon, and off Vancouver Island, were anomalously cool and fresh at depths between 30 and 150 m, suggesting displacement from a more northern source. Anomalous displacements of several hundred kilometers were also found during at least three other periods in the record. Moored temperature measurements at the same location confirm that local waters were persistently cooler during March to October of 2002 than during the previous two years, with the strongest anomaly near 20 m. Coastal sea levels were lower than usual along the northwest coast during spring and early summer 2003, consistent with a southward current anomaly of large scale. Local winds near Newport did not show strong mean anomalies during this period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".