MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148141140 · doi:10.1029/2003gl017436

Enhanced southward flow over the Oregon shelf in 2002: A conduit for subarctic water

2003· article· en· W2148141140 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P. Michael Kosro

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyAnomaly (physics)OceanographyLatitudeCurrent (fluid)Sea levelSubarctic climateClimatologyGeodesy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Moored current measurements from the Oregon shelf during 1998–2003 are used to estimate time series of anomalous alongshore currents and pseudo‐displacements, after accounting for the mean and seasonal cycle. From early January through mid‐June, 2002, currents at 10 m were anomalously strong toward the south by an average 12 cm/s, producing an anomalous displacement of more than 1500 km over about 5 months. This may be compared with the finding by Freeland et al. [2003] that waters at the same latitude off Oregon, and off Vancouver Island, were anomalously cool and fresh at depths between 30 and 150 m, suggesting displacement from a more northern source. Anomalous displacements of several hundred kilometers were also found during at least three other periods in the record. Moored temperature measurements at the same location confirm that local waters were persistently cooler during March to October of 2002 than during the previous two years, with the strongest anomaly near 20 m. Coastal sea levels were lower than usual along the northwest coast during spring and early summer 2003, consistent with a southward current anomaly of large scale. Local winds near Newport did not show strong mean anomalies during this period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.279
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207