MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148183682 · doi:10.1109/acc.2011.5991009

Model predictive control formulation for a class of time-varying linear parabolic PDEs

2011· article· en· W2148183682 on OpenAlexaff
James Ng, Ilyasse Aksikas, Stevan Dubljević

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModel predictive controlParabolic partial differential equationRepresentation (politics)MathematicsApplied mathematicsPartial differential equationDiscrete time and continuous timeControl theory (sociology)Mathematical optimizationState-space representationOptimization problemQuadratic equationTransformation (genetics)Convex optimizationOptimal controlRegular polygonComputer scienceMathematical analysisAlgorithmControl (management)Law

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper considers the model predictive control (MPC) formulation for a class of discrete time-varying linear state-space model representations of parabolic partial differential equations (PDEs) with time-dependent parameters. The time-dependence of the parameters are due to the changes in physical properties or operating conditions of the system such as phase transformation, reactor catalyst fouling, and/or domain deformations which arise in many industrial processes. The MPC formulation is constructed for the low dimensional discrete finite-dimensional state space representation of the PDE system and constraints on input and infinite-dimensional state evolution are incorporated in the convex optimization algorithm. The underlying MPC synthesis is utilizing the appropriately defined model representation of the PDE and yields convex quadratic optimization problem which includes input and PDE state constraints. Using the illustrative example of a crystal growth process in which the time-varying property is associated with the evolution of grown crystal, the proposed time-varying MPC formulation is implemented for the optimal crystal temperature regulation problem under the presence of input and state constraints.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207