MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148223299 · doi:10.1002/polb.20495

Mechanical properties of the novel organometallic polymer poly(ferrocenyldimethylsilane)

2005· article· en· W2148223299 on OpenAlexaff
Chris Smith, Kheng H. Tan, Ken E. Evans, Rui Resendes, A. Bartole-Scott, Ian Manners

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Polymer Science Part B Polymer Physics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSilicone and Siloxane Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtensometerPoisson's ratioModulusMaterials sciencePolymerComposite materialPoisson distributionYoung's modulusPolymer chemistryThermodynamicsMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A study of the mechanical properties of poly(ferrocenyldimethylsilane) [Fe(η‐C 5 H 4 ) 2 SiMe 2 ] n , 3 , a novel organometallic polymer, has been performed on thin films of this material. The Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio of film samples (15 × 1 × 1 mm) of 3 were measured in quasi‐static tension using a video extensometer. For 3 , the values of the Young's moduli ( E ) and Poisson's ratios (ν) were similar between axes in the plane and independent of the splicing direction used during sample preparation. The mean and standard deviation of the Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio were 0.78 ± 0.08 GPa and 0.37 ± 0.06 GPa, respectively. Thermomechanical analysis of 3 revealed a steady decrease of E from a room temperature value of approximately 0.70 GPa. Additionally, it was found that at 150 °C, 3 was unable to support even small stresses, consistent with the onset of a melt transition (ca. 135 °C). A mathematical model based on molecular geometry is developed to describe the results. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 43: 2280–2288, 2005

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.952

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Polymer Science Part B Polymer PhysicsSame topicSilicone and Siloxane ChemistryFrench-language works237,207