La séparation et réunification familiales de dix femmes réfugiées congolaises
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article met en relief l'évolution des rôles de mère, de conjointe, de pourvoyeuse et de personne engagée dans la communauté de dix femmes congolaises réfugiées au Québec. Ces femmes ont toutes vécu un processus de séparation familiale prolongée et de réunification de leur famille en exil. Les principaux éléments de continuité sont les valeurs transmises et les stratégies adoptées pour l'éducation des enfants, la reprise d'une relation conjugale déjà satisfaisante au Congo, ou la rupture des couples boiteux avant l'exil, la responsabilité économique de la femme envers sa famille ainsi que la poursuite de l'engagement en exil pour les femmes déjà engagées chez elles. Les principaux éléments de rupture sont : la chute marquée du statut socioéconomique de la famille et la perte de l'exercice de la profession, l'atrophie de leurs réseaux sociaux et la détérioration des relations avec la famille élargie restée au Congo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".