MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148266094 · doi:10.1002/cm.21142

Cell cortex composition and homeostasis resolved by integrating proteomics and quantitative imaging

2013· article· en· W2148266094 on OpenAlexaff
Maté Biro, Yves Roméo, Sonja Kroschwald, Miia Bovellan, Annett Boden, Joseph Tcherkezian, Philippe P. Roux, Guillaume Charras, Ewa K. Paluch

Bibliographic record

VenueCytoskeleton · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular Mechanics and Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsBiologyCell cortexCortex (anatomy)MorphogenesisCytoskeletonCell biologyOrganelleActinProteomicsNeuroscienceCellBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cellular actin cortex is the cytoskeletal structure primarily responsible for the control of animal cell shape and as such plays a central role in cell division, migration, and tissue morphogenesis. Due to the lack of experimental systems where the cortex can be investigated independently from other organelles, little is known about its composition, assembly, and homeostasis. Here, we describe novel tools to resolve the composition and regulation of the cortex. We report and validate a protocol for cortex purification based on the separation of cellular blebs. Mass spectrometry analysis of purified cortices provides a first extensive list of cortical components. To assess the function of identified proteins, we design an automated imaging assay for precise quantification of cortical actomyosin assembly dynamics. We show subtle changes in cortex assembly dynamics upon depletion of the identified cortical component profilin. Our widely applicable integrated method paves the way for systems-level investigations of the actomyosin cortex and its regulation during morphogenesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations90
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCytoskeletonSame topicCellular Mechanics and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207