An update in pulmonary hypertension in systemic lupus erythematosus – do we need to know about it?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a serious form of pulmonary complication that occurs less frequently in lupus than in other connective tissue diseases like scleroderma; however, it is likely that it is under-recognized in lupus. The symptoms of PH in lupus are non-specific (dyspnea, fatigue, impaired exercise tolerance) and can also be caused by other factors such as pleural or pericardial effusions, interstitial lung disease and many more, making it possible to miss the diagnosis. There are several potential causes of PH in lupus including thromboembolic disease, pulmonary vasculitis, and hypoxia and fibrosis from interstitial lung disease. Endothelin-1 is elevated in lupus and may be associated with PAH. In some studies, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has been found to be a major cause of mortality in lupus patients. Echocardiograms are a screening tool, but may yield false positives, and a right heart catheterization must be performed to confirm PAH. Early identification is important and can alter the natural history of this dangerous complication of lupus. Treatment of PAH associated with lupus includes standard PAH treatment as well as immunosuppression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it