MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148309334 · doi:10.1648/0273-8570-71.3.525

CHARACTERISTICS OF NEST CAVITIES AND NEST TREES OF THE RED-BREASTED SAPSUCKER IN COASTAL MONTANE FORESTS

2000· article· en· W2148309334 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jeffrey B. Joy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Field Ornithology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNest (protein structural motif)TsugaSnagEcologyWestern HemlockBiologyDead treeForestryGeographyHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From May through July 1997 and 1998, I quantified nest tree and cavity characteristics of 32 Red-breasted Sapsucker (Sphyrapicus ruber) nests in the high-elevation coastal forests of northern Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Nests were located in western white pine (Pinus monticola), hemlock (Tsuga sp.), and Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) snags. Nest trees were significantly taller and had a greater DBH than random snags. Nest height was positively correlated with tree height. All nests were in dead trees. The orientation of nest cavity entrances did not differ from random orientations. When choosing nest sites, Red-breasted Sapsuckers are likely balancing predation risk (decreasing at higher nest heights) and adequate nest space and insulation (greater with increasing diameter at lower nest heights).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.605

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Field OrnithologySame topicFire effects on ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207