Muscle phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy oxidative indices correlate with physical activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of physical deconditioning on skeletal muscle's oxidative metabolism as evaluated by phosphorus-31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((31)P MRS). Twenty-seven subjects without muscle disease, representing a wide range of fitness levels, were evaluated with (31)P MRS. Spectra were obtained at rest and during recovery from in-magnet exercise. The data show a significant correlation between maximum resting metabolic equivalent (MET) score and the following (31)P MRS recovery indices: adenosine diphosphate and phosphocreatine recovery half-time; initial phosphocreatine resynthesis rate; calculated estimation of mitochondrial capacity; pH at end of exercise; and phosphocreatine depletion. In addition, significant differences between the deconditioned and conditioned group were found for all of the aforementioned recovery indices. At rest, only the inorganic phosphate concentration was significantly different between the two groups. These data indicate that physical activity level should be taken into account when assessing patients' oxidative metabolism with (31)P MRS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".