Three-dimensional movements within individual dives by ringed seals (<i>Phoca hispida</i>)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We analyzed the three-dimensional movements within individual dives of five freely swimming ringed seals (Phoca hispida). We divided dives into a series of moves, each of which represented continuous movement in one direction, and evaluated several three-dimensional movement variables to distinguish between types of movement within dives. Horizontal directionality proved to be the most useful variable, and we distinguished convoluted and directional movements by fitting a mixture of two normal distributions to the observed horizontal-directionality values. Both convoluted and directional movements occurred within each phase of most dives, suggesting that ringed seals switched between behavioral modes within dive phases. Descent and ascent phases were not simply travel behavior, nor were bottom phases equivalent to patch time, complicating the formulation of optimal diving models for ringed seals. Most ringed seal dives appeared to consist of a series of patch times separated by travel times. Travel behavior accounted for the majority of dive times.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it