MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Identification and Characterization of a Peptide That Specifically Binds the Human, Broadly Neutralizing Anti-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Antibody b12

2001· article· en· W2148366966 on OpenAlexaff
Michael B. Zwick, Lori L. Bonnycastle, Alfredo Menéndez, Melita Irving, Carlos F. Barbas, Paul W.H.I. Parren, Dennis R. Burton, Jamie K. Scott

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Virology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
KeywordsEpitopeBiologyPeptide libraryPeptidePhage displayMonoclonal antibodyAntibodyMolecular biologyVirologyRecombinant DNAPeptide sequenceBiochemistryGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human monoclonal antibody (MAb) b12 recognizes a conformational epitope that overlaps the CD-4-binding site of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope. MAb b12 neutralizes a broad range of HIV-1 primary isolates and protects against primary virus challenge in animal models. We report here the discovery and characterization of B2.1, a peptide that binds specifically to MAb b12. B2.1 was selected from a phage-displayed peptide library by using immunoglobulin G1 b12 as the selecting agent. The peptide is a homodimer whose activity depends on an intact disulfide bridge joining its polypeptide chains. Competition studies with gp120 indicate that B2.1 occupies the b12 antigen-binding site. The affinity of b12 for B2.1 depends on the form in which the peptide is presented; b12 binds best to the homodimer as a recombinant polypeptide fused to the phage coat. Originally, b12 was isolated from a phage-displayed Fab library constructed from the bone marrow of an HIV-1-infected donor. The B2.1 peptide is highly specific for b12 since it selected only phage bearing b12 Fab from this large and diverse antibody library.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.842
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations87
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of VirologySame topicHIV Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207