MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148399495 · doi:10.1080/00927870701866648

Simple Formulae for the Number of Quadrics and Symmetric Forms of Modules Over Local Rings

2008· article· en· W2148399495 on OpenAlexafffund
Georgy P. Egorychev, Eugene V. Zima

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Algebra · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCoding theory and cryptography
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsSimple (philosophy)Algebraic numberInterpretation (philosophy)Type (biology)Representation (politics)Algebra over a fieldPure mathematicsMathematical analysisComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Simple formulae of similar type for the number of quadrics and symmetric forms of modules over local rings are found analytically. This simplification of known formulae of Levchuk and Starikova is achieved using integral representation method of combinatorial summation and leads to number-theoretical identities of new type. The problem of algebraic interpretation of new formulae is posed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.011
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications in AlgebraSame topicCoding theory and cryptographyFrench-language works237,207